|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||
| MOE > ESD > Ecosystems Branch > Ecology > Terrestrial & Predictive Ecosystem Mapping > Data Access | |||||||||
|
|
Data Access EcoCat: Ecosystems Report Catalogue (formerly AquaCat) Most Ecosystem Mapping and Wildlife Interpretations project data can be found here.
FTP sites Interim ftp sites have been set up to hold TEM, PEM, WHR and SEI projects that have not yet been entered into Ecocat. Note:
Government Users Most BC Government Technical/GIS users have access to the spatial databases internally through the MSRM Arc Warehouse and soon through the Land Resource Data Warehouse (LRDW). About the Data Terrestrial Ecosystem Mapping and Predictive Ecosystem Mapping Data The types of data that may be posted for TEM and PEM are described in the TEM and PEM technical standards and are listed below.
The provincial TEM and PEM index maps show the boundaries for all the TEM and PEM projects that have been initiated. Data may not yet be available for all projects shown. Wildlife Habitat Ratings Data Proviso: All project rating tables and species accounts on the FTP site are in draft form. Project ratings tables have been reviewed to ensure they follow the standard formats and codes stipulated in BC Wildlife Habitat Rating Standards (RIC[now RISC]1999) and BC Wildlife Habitat Rating Technical Standards (RIC 2000). The actual values of the ratings have not been correlated or reviewed in detail. There has been no correlation at this time to resolve issues such as, for example, whether or not the same ecosystems in two different projects have been rated consistently. Users of these ratings tables should contact the regional wildlife biologist or wildlife habitat inventory specialist if they have any questions about appropriate applications of project wildlife habitat ratings data. Always include all the relevant species accounts in a project when downloading and distributing the project ratings tables. Ratings tables and resultant habitat capability and suitability maps are of limited value without the rationale for ratings documented in the species accounts. If you would like a listing of the example provincial-level species accounts by region click here.
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||