Provincial
Beaver Management
Policy Summary
Next
Page

The
beaver has been many things in the history of Canada and British
Columbia. National symbol. Source of food and clothing for aboriginal
peoples. A driving force for European exploration of North America.
Beaver pelts even served as currency in early colonial period. Some
of the first wildlife regulations in British Columbia applied to
the beaver, including the province-wide hunting and trapping closures
between 1906 and 1911 and between 1919 and 1921. By the mid-1940s,
British Columbia wildlife authorities considered the beaver the
most important fur resource because its dams provided habitats for
other important furbearers such as mink, muskrats and otters. Other
observers have cited the beaver-produced benefits to other wildlife
including fish, moose, waterfowl and a variety of other birds. A
healthy beaver trapline is rich in other wildlife, as well. This
publication has been written to provide trappers with some guidelines
on how to manage this valuable resource.
ECONOMIC
CONSIDERATIONS
There
is evidence that beavers are greatly under harvested in British
Columbia. Annual harvests during the 1980s have averaged only 16,000
pelts. These small annual harvests have never exceeded six per cent
of the most recent beaver population estimate of 400,000 to 600,000
animals, completed in 1979. Most authorities agree that beavers
can usually sustain annual harvests of at least 25 per cent of their
population or, from 100,000 to 150,000 animals in British Columbia.
The highest average pelt price of $52 was paid in 1946, the same
year the province experienced the biggest beaver harvest, 23,000
pelts. Total revenue to British Columbia beaver trappers that year
was $1.2 million. The positive impact of beavers on the economy
of British Columbia and North America is not limited to the value
of their fur. Beavers also produce environmental benefits. They
create and maintain habitats for other species of animals. They
also work to stabilize watersheds, an activity with real, but unmeasured,
dollar values.
On
the negative side, beavers cost North Americans millions of dollars
every year by causing flooding and associated damage to private
and public property. The exact dollar value of the damage done by
beavers in British Columbia is not known, but it may be substantial
in some areas. Beaver activity can also harm fisheries values, by
impeding fish movement through rivers and streams at critical times
of the year. Balanced management of the beaver resource-the theme
of this publication-can increase the benefits to British Columbia
through more revenue from pelt sales and decreased damage to property
and fisheries.
Next
Page