Water Quality
Ministry of Water, Land And Air Protection
Ambient
Working
Water Quality Guidelines
for
Phenols
Prepared pursuant to
Section 2(e) of the
Environment Management Act, 1981
April 19, 2002
This document is one in a series that establishes ambient water quality guidelines for British Columbia. The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) has recently developed new guidelines of 4 ug/L for mono and dihydric phenols to protect freshwater aquatic life. The Ministry has published guidelines for chlorophenols, but needed to evaluate the CCME guidelines to decide which phenols were to be included as total phenols. Another factor that raised the priority of this review was that the Ministry is undertaking a Stage 2 Contaminated Sites Regulation amendment.
Suitable data documenting the effects of phenols for most water uses is lacking, therefore, we have only derived guidelines to protect aquatic life. Due to time and data constraints, and since the Ministry has guidelines for chlorinated phenols, this document only recommends working water quality guidelines for non-halogenated phenols to protect freshwater aquatic life. These working guidelines will need to be converted to more scientifically defensible guidelines when time and data permit.
At extremely low phenol values, there are two effects apparent in phenol-contaminated waters:
The data on which these working guidelines for phenols are based are summarized in tables in the appendices to this report.
The working water quality guidelines are summarized in Table 1.
| Non-halogenated phenol species | Guideline (micrograms/L) |
| 4-hydroxyphenol (hydroquinone, quinol) | 2.0 micrograms/L |
| 3-hydroxyphenol (resorcinol) | 12.5 micrograms/L |
| total of all other phenols* | 50.0 micrograms/L |
| * Total of all other Phenols=Total Phenols - (all chlorinated phenols + hydroquinone + resorcinol). |
THE MINISTRY OF WATER, LAND AND AIR PROTECTION develops ambient water quality guidelines for British Columbia. This work has two goals:
The guidelines represent safe conditions or safe levels of a substance in water. The term guideline is defined as:
| a maximum and/or a minimum value for a physical, chemical or biological characteristic of water, sediment or biota, which should not be exceeded to prevent detrimental effects from occurring to a water use under given environmental conditions. |
Water Quality guidelines are applied province-wide, but they are use-specific, and are being developed for these water uses:
The guidelines are established following a thorough review of the recent scientific literature, guidelines set by other jurisdictions and environmental conditions in British Columbia. The scientific literature provides information on environmental fate, persistence and effects of toxicants on various life forms. This information is not always conclusive because it is often based on laboratory testing that, at best, only approximates field conditions. To compensate for this uncertainty, and applying the precautionary principle, the guidelines have built-in safety factors that are conservative, while taking into account the natural background in the province. The guidelines are used to set ambient site-specific water quality objectives for specific waterbodies. In setting the objectives, considerations are given to present and future water uses, waste discharges, hydrology, limnology, oceanography and ambient water quality conditions at the site in question.
In most cases the objectives are the same as the guidelines. However, when natural background levels of substances exceed the guidelines, the site-specific objective could be less stringent than the guideline in order to take this high natural level into account. In rare instances for example if the resource is unusually valuable or of special provincial or ecological significance the safety factor could be increased enabling objectives to be more stringent than the guidelines. Another approach would be to develop site-specific objectives by conducting toxicity experiments in the field. However, because this approach is costly and time consuming, it is seldom used.
Neither the guidelines nor the objectives derived from them have any legal standing. However, objectives can be used to calculate waste discharge limits for contaminants. These limits are outlined in waste management permits, orders and approvals, all of which have legal standing. Objectives are not usually incorporated as conditions of a permit.
Water quality guidelines are subject to review and revision, as new information becomes available or as other circumstances dictate.
| The
guidelines apply to the ambient raw water source before it is diverted
or treated for domestic use. The Ministry of Health regulates the quality of water for domestic use after it is treated and delivered by a water purveyor. Guidelines relating to public health at bathing beaches are the same as those used by the Ministry of Health which regulates the recreation and aesthetic use. |
PHENOLS
In chemical terminology, a phenol is a single aromatic ring organic compound with an -OH group. An alkyl, straight chain or ring, organic compound with an -OH group is an alcohol. A double aromatic ring organic compound with an -OH group is a naphthol.
Phenol, formerly called carbolic acid, is an aromatic organic compound, C6H5OH. It is weakly acidic and resembles an alcohol in structure. The colourless, needlelike crystals of purified phenol melt at 43°C (109°F) and boil at 182°C (360°F). Phenol is soluble in organic solvents and slightly soluble in water at room temperature, and completely soluble above 66°C (150.8°F). It is a constituent of coal tar.
Phenol was first used as a disinfectant in 1867 by the British surgeon Joseph Lister for sterilizing wounds, surgical dressings, and instruments. Dilute solutions are useful antiseptics, but strong solutions are corrosive and scarring to tissue. Less irritating and more efficient germicides have replaced phenol, but it is widely used in the manufacture of resins, plastics, insecticides, explosives, dyes, and detergents. It is also used as a raw material for the production of medicinal drugs such as aspirin.
The term phenol is also used for any of a group of related acidic compounds that are hydroxyl derivatives of aromatic hydrocarbons. These include such substances as cresol, catechol, quinol, xylenol, guaiacol and resorcinol. For consistency and clarity these are all named as substituted phenols in this document. See Appendix 1 for a partial list of some phenol compounds.
The latest CCME document combines all of the 1- and 2-hydric phenols together into one group for setting guidelines based on toxicity. We have followed the same procedure for establishing these working guidelines with the exception of setting separate guidelines for 4-hydroxyphenol (hydroquinone) and 3-hydroxyphenol (resorcinol). There are several reasons for this.
There can be large differences in the toxicity of the various distinct phenol compounds, particularly when the substituents are strong electron donors or sinks. This can lead to over-protection for some of these compounds because the guideline is established to accommodate the most toxic phenol.
There is a paucity of existing reliable data that can be used to set guidelines for individual compounds. The guidelines are set to account for the most toxic phenols. If circumstances warrant, it is recommended that dischargers carry out Water Effect Ratio trials with their specific effluent and their ambient water to determine an acceptable site-specific phenol concentration.
Toluene and the xylenes are not phenols in their un-substituted form. Toluene is 1-methyl benzene and the xylenes are: 1, 2-dimethyl benzene, 1, 3-dimethyl benzene or 1, 4-dimethyl benzene. However, if one of the other substitutions on the benzene ring is a hydroxy group, then they become a phenol, cresol or xylenol. Therefore, for example: 4-hydroxy toluene, 4-methyl phenol, 1-methyl-4-hydroxy benzene, and 1-hydroxy-4-methyl benzene are all the same compound, as are 3, 4-dimethyl phenol, 3, 4-dimethyl xylenol, 1-hydroxy-3, 4-dimethyl benzene and 2-methyl-4-hydroxy toluene.
One must be aware of all these alternate names when looking up data on phenol compounds. It is best to try to find one name in the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry that has a bewildering variety of alternate names listed. Using the substituted benzene or phenol nomenclature can reduce the ambiguity and confusion. In this document, we try to use only a few alternate names.
There are, in theory, an infinite number of phenols since up to 5 'R' groups (long-chain aliphatics) can be substituted and each of these can be very complex and substituted itself. In practice, there are far too many phenols to deal with individually but the toxic properties of many long-chain aliphatic substituted compounds will be quite similar. It is the toxicity of the phenols with simple substituents like methyl (-CH3), hydroxyl (-OH), amino (-NH2), nitro (-NO2), methoxy (-CH3O) and the halogens (-Cl, -Br, -I, -F) that are of most toxicological concern. Most phenols are used as bactericides, fungicides and herbicides; particularly the halogenated phenols, and especially the chlorinated halophenols.
The environmental half-lives of most phenols are short, rarely as long as a month. Some are photo-degraded, especially in air. The microbial half-life is short, typically measured in days under aerobic conditions. Once a discharge ceases, environmental levels will drop rapidly due to bacterial breakdown. The half-life of phenols in fish is less than one day and phenols do not accumulate. Hence the existence of high levels in fish tissues indicates chronic or current exposure.
Microorganisms will alter their metabolic processes to utilize phenols. If they have not previously been exposed there will be an initial adaptation period until a large microbial population has been established. Any subsequent additions of phenols will be quickly degraded.
The following guidelines are based on readily available existing information which is summarized in tables in Appendix 2. The Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) has set guidelines for all mono- and di-hydric phenols.
FRESHWATER AQUATIC LIFE
Aquatic Life is the only water use for which guidelines are being set in this document. They are working guidelines subject to revision when more complete data become available. The maximum concentration of 4-hydroxyphenol (quinol, hydroquinone, 1,4-benzenediol) should not exceed 2 micrograms/L. The maximum concentration of 3-hydroxyphenol (resorcinol, 1,3-benzenediol) should not exceed 12.5 micrograms/L, and the maximum concentration of the total of all other non-halogenated phenols should not exceed 50 micrograms/L.
RATIONALE
The lowest LC50 data found for many phenols is presented in Table 2. The lowest effect for 4-hydroxyphenol (hydroquinone) was for Daphnia magna, at 0.04 mg/L. For 3-hydroxyphenol (resorcinol), the lowest effect level measured was at 0.25 mg/L, also forDaphnia magna. These were divided by a safety factor of 20:1 in order to estimate a safe minimal, or no effect, level for other freshwater species.
The next most toxic form of phenol was reported for fathead minnows, Pimphales promelas using 4-phenylazophenol at 1.17 mg/L. We have assumed that the sum of all other phenols present (non-chlorinated) should not exceed this level since there are many phenol compounds with similar toxicity (see Table 2).Therefore, for all other phenols, we divided this level by a factor of 20 to estimate the safe level.
Chlorophenols, hydroquinone and resorcinol should be measured separately and compared to their respective proposed guideline values. A measurement of total phenols minus the sum of total chlorophenols, hydroquinone, and resorcinol allows one to determine if the guideline for total phenols is met.
This is a selected list of some of the phenols that are in commercial use and may be found in waste streams. There are many more phenols, some found only in natural products and not in commercial use. All will have their own distinct acute and chronic guideline levels.
Phenol (CAS #108-95-2)
The basic, simplest, parent compound is phenol, C6H6O. It is also called monohydroxy benzene, hydroxy benzene, benzenol, phenylic acid, phenyl hydroxide, benzophenol, phenyl hydrate, phenylic alcohol, monophenol, phenic acid, oxybenzene, hydroxy benzene or carbolic acid. Phenol can have a wide variety and number of substituents on the other five locations of the benzene ring.
Cresols
Cresols, C6H8O, are methyl phenols and have one methyl group in the ortho, meta or para (second, third or fourth, respectively) position on the parent phenol. The unsubstituted parent compounds are also called ortho: 1-hydroxy-2-methyl benzene, 2-methyl phenol, 2-hydroxy toluene, 1-methyl-2-hydroxy benzene; meta: 1-hydroxy-3-methyl benzene, 3-methyl phenol, 3-hydroxy toluene, 1-methyl-3-hydroxy benzene: para: 1-hydroxy-4-methyl benzene, 4-methyl phenol, 4-hydroxy toluene and 1-methyl-4-hydroxy benzene.
The CAS numbers of the parent compounds are: o-cresol (CAS #95-48-7), m-cresol (CAS #108-39-4) and p-cresol (CAS #106-44-5).
Guaiacol (CAS #90-05-1)
Guaiacols, C7H8O2, have an ortho or 2-substituted methoxy on the parent phenol. They are o-methoxy hydroxybenzenes and the parent unsubstituted compound is also called 1-hydroxy-2-methoxy benzene, 2-methoxy phenol and guaiacol. These are natural wood digestion products and often have other substitutions on the other four sites.
Resorcinol (CAS #108-46-3)
Resorcinols, C6H6O2, have a second meta or 3-substituted hydroxy on the parent phenol. They are m-dihydroxy benzenes and the parent unsubstituted compound is also called 1, 3-dihydroxy benzene, 3-hydroxy phenol, 1, 3-benzenediol and Resorcinol.
Catechol (CAS #120-80-9)
Catechols, C6H6O2, have a second ortho or 2-substituted hydroxy on the parent phenol. They are o-dihydroxy benzenes and also called 1, 2-dihydroxy benzene, 2-hydroxy phenol, 1, 2-benzenediol, pyrocatechol and catechol.
Xylenols
Xylenols, C8H10O, are dimethyl phenols. They have two methyl groups and at least one hydroxy group. The methyls may be 1, 2-, 1, 3- or 1, 4- (ortho, meta and para respectively, relative to each other) and the hydroxyl can then be on any of the other four sites. This allows for 6 different possible isomers. Choosing one of the isomers at random, some of the names are 1-hydroxy-3, 4-dimethyl benzene, 1, 2-dimethyl-4-hydroxy benzene, 3, 4-dimethyl phenol, 3, 4-xylenol, 4-hydroxy-o xylene and 2-methyl-4-hydroxy-toluene.
The CAS numbers of the six parent compounds are: 2, 3-xylenol (CAS# 526-75-0), 2, 4-xylenol.(CAS# 105-67-9), 2, 5-xylenol (CAS #95-87-4), 2, 6-xylenol (CAS# 576-26-1), 3, 4-xylenol (CAS #95-65-8) and 3, 5-xylenol (CAS# 108-68-9).
Quinol or Hydroquinone (CAS #123-31-9)
Quinols or hydroquinones, C6H6O2, have a second para or 4-substituted hydroxy on the parent phenol. They are p-dihydroxy benzenes and the parent unsubstituted compound is also called 1, 4-dihydroxy benzene, 4-hydroxy phenol, 1, 4-benzenediol, hydroquinone and quinol.
Naphthols
When there are two joined aromatic rings with a hydroxy group on at least one of them, the compound is called a naphthol and now there are seven more sites for substitution and the nomenclature gets a little more complex. However, we are only concerned with phenols in this document.
The CCME aquatic life guideline for mono-hydric phenols and di-hydric phenols, as a group, is 4 micrograms/L in fresh water; no guideline was set in marine water. Toxicity varies widely by organism, dissolved oxygen and temperature. The sequence of decreasing toxicities is generally phenol, p-cresol, o-cresol, m-cresol and catechol. A preliminary search of the internet did not turn up much aquatic toxicity data, primarily MSDS, Material Safety Data Sheet, and OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health, lab-rat data. Some reported acute and chronic toxicity values are listed in the tables in Appendix 2.
Phenol, o-cresol, m-cresol, p-cresol, 2, 3-xylenol, 2, 4-xylenol, 2, 5-xylenol, 2, 6-xylenol, 3, 4-xylenol, 3, 5 xylenol and all the derivatives of catechol, resorcinol and quinol have low vapour pressures, under one kPa and high water solubilities, in the grams per litre range. Oxidation and microbial degradation are the main fates of phenols in the environment. Sorption is low as are log Kow values; generally under 2.0, reaching only 2.5 as a maximum.
Some simple substituted phenols
phenolsSome complex R group substituted phenols
PhenolThe lowest AQUIRE data base values for the various phenol groups range from 0.044 to 25.9 mg/L, three orders of magnitude. Using a standard acute to chronic ratio of 20 leads to guideline values from 2.2 to 1300 micrograms/L or 0.0022 to 1.30 mg/L. The CCME 1999 Guideline to protect aquatic life from mono and dihydric phenols is 4 micrograms/L. Setting the guideline to protect the most sensitive species from the most toxic phenol leads to gross overprotection for some species and some phenols. This AQUIRE data is for the un-substituted parent phenols of each group. The toxic values will change as hydroxy, nitro, amino, methyl, methoxy and other 'R' groups are substituted, at various places and in various numbers and combinations, onto the parent phenol of each group.
| Phenol | Species | References | LC50 |
| 4-hydroxyphenol (hydroquinone) | Daphnia | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 0.04 |
| 3-hydroxyphenol (resorcinol) | Daphnia | Ewell et al, 1986 | 0.25 |
| 4-phenylazophenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 1.17 |
| 4-methylphenol (4-cresol) | Daphnia | Parkhurst et al, 1979 | 1.4 |
| 2,4-dinitro-6-methylphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 1.54 |
| 3-methylphenol (3-cresol) | Daphnia | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 1.6 |
| 4-tert-pentylphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 2.59 |
| 2,5-dinitrophenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 3.36 |
| 4-hydroxyphenol (catechol) | fathead minnow | DeGraeve et al, 1980 | 3.5 |
| 2,5-dimethylphenol | Daphnia | Devilliers et al, 1985 | 3.5-10 |
| phenol | Daphnia | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 3.9 |
| 2,4-dinitrophenol | Daphnia | LeBlanc, 1980 | 4.1 |
| 4-phenoxyphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 4.95 |
| 2-methylphenol (2-cresol) | Daphnia | Parkhurst et al, 1979 | 5.0 |
| 4-tert-butylphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 5.15 |
| 2-phenylphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 6.15 |
| 2,3-dimethylphenol | Daphnia | Devilliers et al, 1985 | 10-35 |
| 3,5-dimethylphenol | Daphnia | Devilliers et al, 1985 | 10-35 |
| 4-ethylphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 10.4 |
| 4-propylphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 11.0 |
| 2-allylphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 15.0 |
| 2,4-dimethylphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 16.6 |
| 4-nitrophenol | Daphnia | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 18 |
| 3-methyl-4-nitrophenol | Daphnia | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 18 |
| 3-nitrophenol | Daphnia | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 27 |
| 2-nitro-5-methylphenol | Daphnia | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 31 |
| 2-nitro-4-aminophenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 36.2 |
| 2-nitrophenol | Daphnia | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 63 |
| 2-nitro-4-methylphenol | Daphnia | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 63 |
| 3-methoxyphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 74 |
| 2,4,6-trinitrophenol | Daphnia | LeBlanc, 1980 | 85 |
| 4-methoxyphenol | fathead minnow | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 110 |
| Catechols,
resorcinols, quinols, guaicols, cresols and xylenols have been named as
substituted phenols. 2,3,4 are used instead of o,m,p. Daphnia is Daphnia magna fathead minnow is Pimphales promelas. |
| Phenol | Species | Assay | References | LC50 |
| 2-allylphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 15.0 |
| 2-hydroxyphenol (catechol) | fathead | m, 96 | DeGraeve et al, 1980 | 3.5 |
| 2-methylphenol (2-cresol) | Daphnia | n, 48 | Parkhurst et al, 1979 | 5.0 |
| 2-nitrophenol | Daphnia | n, 24 | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 63 |
| 2-nitro-4-aminophenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 36.2 |
| 2-nitro-4-methylphenol | Daphnia | n, 24 | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 63 |
| 2-nitro-5-methylphenol | Daphnia | n, 24 | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 31 |
| 2-phenylphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 6.15 |
| 2,3-dimethylphenol | Daphnia | ..... | Devilliers et al, 1985 | 10-35 |
| 2,4-dimethylphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 16.6 |
| 2,4-dinitrophenol | Daphnia | n, 48 | LeBlanc, 1980 | 4.1 |
| 2,4-dinitro-6-methylphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 1.54 |
| 2,4,6-trinitrophenol | Daphnia | n, 48 | LeBlanc, 1980 | 85 |
| 2,5-dimethylphenol | Daphnia | ..... | Devilliers et al, 1985 | 3.5-10 |
| 2,5-dinitrophenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 3.36 |
| 3-hydroxyphenol (resorcinol) | Daphnia | n, 96 | Ewell et al, 1986 | 0.25 |
| 3-methoxyphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 74 |
| 3-methylphenol (3-cresol) | Daphnia | m, 24 | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 1.6 |
| 3-methyl-4-nitrophenol | Daphnia | n, 24 | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 18 |
| 3-nitrophenol | Daphnia | n, 24 | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 27 |
| 3,5-dimethylphenol | Daphnia | ..... | Devilliers et al, 1985 | 10-35 |
| 4-ethylphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 10.4 |
| 4-methoxyphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 110 |
| 4-methylphenol (4-cresol) | Daphnia | n, 48 | Parkhurst et al, 1979 | 1.4 |
| 4-nitrophenol | Daphnia | n, 24 | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 18 |
| 4-phenoxyphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 4.95 |
| 4-phenylazophenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 1.17 |
| 4-propylphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 11.0 |
| 4-tert-butylphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 5.15 |
| 4-tert-pentylphenol | fathead | m, 96 | Geiger et al, 1984-1988 | 2.59 |
| phenol | Daphnia | n, 24 | Bringmann et al, 1977 | 3.9 |
| Catechols,
resorcinols, quinols, guaicols, cresols and xylenols have been named as
substituted phenols. 2,3,4 are used instead of o,m,p. Daphnia is Daphnia magna fathead is Pimphales promelas. n = nominal, m = measured. 24, 48, 96 are the duration of the assay in hours. |
| phenol | xylenols | |||||
| 2,3- | 2,4- | 2,5- | 2,6- | 3,4- | 3,5- | |
| 1.5 | 10.0 | 2.1 | 10.0 | 0.5 | 13.7 | 10.0 |
| 2.0 | 35.0 | 3.1 | 35.0 | 2.2 | 14.0 | 14.5 |
| 5.0 | .... | 3.4 | 35.0 | 11.2 | 15.0 | 22.0 |
| 6.0 | .... | 5.4 | .... | 11.2 | .... | 34.0 |
| 6.25 | .... | 6.3 | .... | 11.2 | .... | 35.0 |
| 6.5 | .... | 7.8 | .... | 15.3 | .... | .... |
| 6.5 | .... | 8.3 | .... | 16.5 | .... | .... |
| 10.0 | .... | 13.0 | .... | 21.0 | .... | .... |
| 10.0 | .... | 14.0 | .... | .... | .... | .... |
| 13.8 | .... | 15.4 | .... | .... | .... | .... |
| 16.0 | .... | 17.0 | .... | .... | .... | .... |
| 16.0 | .... | 18.0 | .... | .... | .... | .... |
| 16.0 | .... | 18.1 | .... | .... | .... | .... |
| There are high values (over 100) for plants, mostly Lemna minor which floats on the surface and for some surficial insects. All values over 100 have been edited from the table. For phenol, where there were over 1000 AQUIRE records, and for o-cresol, only values under 19 mg/L are shown to keep the table to a reasonable length. |
| catechol | resorcinol |