spacerThe MinisterNewsSearchReports and PublicationsContacts
Environmental Protection Division Ministry Home Page Ministry Home Page BC Government Home Page Groundwater home page Ministry Home BC Government Home
spacer

Water Quality

Offstream Watering to Reduce Livestock Use of
Watercourses and Riparian Areas


Introduction

Degradation of water quality from agricultural non-point sources has long been a concern throughout the province. Concerns of bacterial contamination from Cryptosporidium and Giardia, excess nutrient inputs and the physical damage to riparian and streamside habitats are common. The cost of pursuing these problems within the current legal framework makes proactive prevention of water quality problems an attractive option.

Staff from the Ministries of Water, Land and Air Protection and Agriculture, Food and Fisheries have been working with the Kamloops Stock Association and landowners to demonstrate how offstream livestock watering can reduce livestock use of unfenced watercourses. This in turn should reduce the adverse impacts on water quality and habitat associated with livestock access. To date, four sites have been established.

 

Why Offstream Watering?

Two reasons for considering offstream livestock watering are:

  1. to provide a properly sited, easily accessible and reliable water source
  2. to reduce the impact livestock may be causing by having direct access to a watercourse

Impact concerns will relate to the type of watercourse, the presence of fish, the downstream use of the water (including drinking water) and the livestock use (density, duration and timing of use). For example, winter feeding sites may have more risk of impacts to a watercourse than a grazing area on rangeland.

While the first thought in water and riparian protection may be to prevent access by fencing the watercourse, this is not always the best solution. An appropriate offstream water system, properly sited and installed, can help determine if fencing is required at all.

Back to Top

 

Site # 1: South Thompson River

Summer Grazing and Winter Feeding Site

photo of propane heated waterer
Propane Heated Waterer

  Wolf Ranch.
This site is a post-calving area for approximately 150 cow-calf pairs and is used from late-February to late-April. Summer grazing may also occur. Livestock have easy access to the South Thompson River for water in two or three locations which all have good footing. The rest of the riverbank is too steep for livestock to use as river access.

The waterer was installed about 400 feet back from the river on an existing trail to the river. It is a 'typical' waterer-on-concrete-pad installation of a Ritchie Model #5 cattle waterer. A water line was trenched approximately 300 m from the ranch water system to the waterer. Electrical power was also this distance away so the propane-heated option was chosen to provide frost protection. The system was installed in November 1998 with the assistance of the Wolf Ranch.


The feeding locations are 60 to 180 m back from the waterer (180 to 370 m from the river). By mid-April the grass 'greens up' and livestock are attracted towards the river as shown below. Before 'green up' use of the waterer is approximately 95% but is reduced to 65% as livestock graze near the river. With the installation of the waterer, overall livestock use of the river is estimated to be reduced by 80%.


photo of Wolf Ranch site
Wolf Ranch site along the South Thompson River near Pritchard


Back to Top

 

Site # 2: North Thompson River

Fall Grazing and Winter Feeding Site

photo of cows at earth-heated waterer
"Earth-Heated" Waterer

 

Puhallo Ranch.
This site is a fall grazing and winter feeding area for approximately 175 cows. The area was already fenced from the river with gates used to allow river access. Due to its riparian importance, and to observe livestock response, this site was chosen to demonstrate a unique, 'earth-heated' waterer.

The waterer is installed between two fields, 250 m back from the riparian fence. It is approximately 600 m to the main ranch site for the water line and electricity. Although the water line could reasonably be trenched that far, it is too far to run electricity. The system was installed in November 1999 with the assistance of the Puhallo Ranch.


The waterer design consists of three, 2.4 m long tanks set 1.8 m in-ground using 'earth-heat' for frost protection. Two tanks are drinkers rated for up to 200 cows. No concrete pad is required. No ground reinforcement was used around the waterer, but this may be required at some sites. The waterer goes by the trade name "Thermo-Sink" and is manufactured in Alberta. A one-drinker version is available for 100 cows.

Some icing on the drinkers had to be broken up but was manageable.


photo of Puhallo Ranch site
Puhallo Ranch site along the North Thompson River

Back to Top

 

Site # 3: Campbell Creek

Fall Grazing and Winter Feeding Site

photo of flow-through-heated waterer
"Flow-Through-
Heated" Waterer


Frolek Cattle Company
This site is a fall grazing and winter feeding area for approximately 250 cows along Campbell Creek (south of Kamloops). Access to the creek for watering is by a few low-bank areas; the remainder of the creek is mainly high-bank. Water is pumped from a shallow well to the waterer. Electricity is available approximately 55 m away and ground water is within 1.2 m to 1.8 m.

A Ritchie WaterMaster 90 waterer [with flow-through] was installed on a concrete-pad. Instead of using an electrical heat element for frost protection, water is continuously pumped through the waterer with flow back to a rock pit near the well. Heat loss from the waterer is balanced with heat gain from the circulating water. The pump is wired with a pre-set timer and the trough was installed so it would self-drain when the pump is shut off.

The feeding area runs long and narrow along the creek. The waterer is located approximately 1/3 the distance from one end of the site and is approximately 75 m from the creek, centered between the creek and the upper side of the field. The system was installed in October 2000 with the assistance of the Frolek Cattle Company.


photo of Frolek Cattle Co. site
Frolek Cattle Company site along Campbell Creek, south of Kamloops

Back to Top

 

Site # 4: Laurie Guichon Memorial Grasslands Interpretive Site

Spring and Fall
Grazing Area

photo of gravity energy waterer
Gravity Energy
"Pumps" Water


This site is a grazing area in Lundbom Lake Commonage, south of Merritt, where a public Grasslands Interpretive Site, named in honour of Laurie Guichon, is being developed. A pond and wetland area on this site is the water source for the grazing livestock of Chutter Ranch Ltd. It was decided to make a 'typical' gravity-fed livestock watering system part of the public education information at this site. Initially the pond will not be fenced off from the livestock. Approximately 250 cows may use the site in a spring /fall grazing rotation.

The technical challenge of this site is the small elevation difference between the pond and a good waterer location. The best site (greatest head) would be too wet in the spring; most upland sites were too high for gravity flow. The site chosen is 120 m from the pond with a 0.5 m elevation between 'average' low pond level and full waterer level.

To ensure water flow at this low 'head', 10 cm diameter PVC pipe is used that has an very low friction loss at the flow rate required. A 'typical' culvert-on-end is used for the intake. A screened inlet, shutoff valve and air inlet stand pipe are inside the culvert, which has openings along its side for water entry and is back filled with drain rock. A modified steel waterer [courtesy of Forest Service] is used.

The system was installed in November 2000 with the assistance of Ducks Unlimited and with equipment donated by Sanders & Co. of Merritt.


photo of Laurie Guichon Memorial Grasslands
The Laurie Guichon Memorial Grasslands Interpretive
Site Pond / Wetland

Back to Top

 

Project Funding Partners

These four projects grew out of funding for a demonstration project from the Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks (now called Water, Land and Air Protection), Water Quality Section, [Non-Point Source Pollution]. This funded the first project at the Wolf Ranch in 1998.

With additional ministry funding, matching funds from the Kamloops Stock Association [from the Beef Cattle Industry Development Fund], in-kind assistance from the landowners and Sanders & Co equipment, and planning and installation from the Ministries of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and Environment, Lands and Parks (now called, Water, Land and Air Protection), as well as Ducks Unlimited, three more projects were installed.

Total funding was $16,000. With in-kind contributions estimated at $6,000, each installation cost an average of $5,500.

Back to Top

 

What Has Been Learned?

To date, observations have been made at the Wolf Ranch, site #1, on the behaviour of the cows, as noted. Limited observations have been made on sites #2 and #3. No livestock have used site #4 yet.

Observations and livestock tendencies noted so far include:

  • Cows seem to be opportunistic, using the most readily available water
    • however, a water source close at hand but with poor access or footing may not be initially chosen
  • Drinking patterns [i.e., time of day, herd instinct] may affect whether cows will 'wait-their-turn' at a waterer or walk away from it to drink at a somewhat distant, but uncrowded water source
    • winter waterers generally have small drinker openings to reduce the heat loss and this requires cows to be patient
    • this is not usually a concern once cows know that the waterer is reliable and they can drink whenever they want during the day
    • however, if an alternate water source [i.e., unfenced watercourse] is easily accessible it may reduce their use of the waterer

Back to Top

 

What Is Next?

Agriculture and AgriFood Canada, Kamloops Research Station, is collecting watering behaviour information on the Wolf Ranch, site #1, to more accurately assess livestock choice of either the waterer or the river.

These project sites are representative of many ranch situations that have established watercourse access. A temporary barrier, such as an electric fence, wooden debris, etc., may allow natural vegetation to re-grow, creating a permanent barrier at access points. A temporary barrier would allow a 'transition' period that may be necessary to change livestock watering behaviour.

Offstream systems, while potentially reducing watercourse and riparian impacts, (up to 80% reduced use by livestock on site #1 is estimated) come at a cost that can be significant:

  • Livestock benefits need to be documented
  • Riparian / water quality benefits need to be documented
  • Costs may need to be shared between landowners and others who benefit


 

 

Feedback Privacy Disclaimer Copyright Top
spacer