Water Title Banner Ministry Home Government of British Columbia Water Quality Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection

Water Quality

WATER MANAGEMENT BRANCH
ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE DIVISION
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, LANDS AND PARKS

SECOND REPORT ON
CHEMICAL SENSITIVITY OF BC LAKES
TO ACIDIC INPUTS

SEPTEMBER 1987

Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data

Swain, L. G. (Leslie Grant), 1950-
Second Report on chemical sensitivity of BC lakes to acidic inputs

ISBN 0-7726-0709-5

1.  Limnology - British Columbia.
2.  Acid pollution of rivers, lake, etc. - British Columbia.
I.  British Columbia. Ministry of Environment and Parks.
II. Title  III. Title: Chemical Sensitivity of BC lakes to acidic inputs.


QH106.2.B7S82 1987    551.48'2'09711    C87-092177-0

TABLE OF CONTENTS


ABSTRACT

This second summary document provides information (pH, alkalinity, calcium and sensitivity rating) for about 760 lakes sampled between 1977 and 1986. This represents about 3.5% of the estimated 22,000 lakes in British Columbia. It provides locations where ten lakes with pH less than 6.0 have been found and presents a generalized sensitivity map for the province. A distribution of lakes in the Province by sensitivity indicator is presented which shows that about 20% of the lakes have high sensitivity to acidic inputs.

Information is also provided on calculated relationships between total dissolved solids and several characteristics. Relationships with a high level of confidence exist for calcium, inflection point alkalinity and alkalinity to pH 4.5.

Return To The Table of Contents

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The data presented in this report are a result of the concientious efforts of personnel from the Ministry of Environment and Parks. In particular, personnel from regional offices of Waste Management, staff of the Resource Quality Section of Water Management Branch and staff of the Fisheries Branch were instrumental in obtaining these data.

Ms. L. Rounds typed several drafts of this report.

To these people goes the credit for any information presented herein. As author, I must take responsibility for any inaccuracies

Return To The Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

This second summary document of the chemical sensitivity of lakes in British Columbia provides information on about 760 lakes sampled in the period 1977-1986. This represents about 3.5% of the estimated 22,000 lakes in British Columbia. The distribution of this sampling within British Columbia is shown on Figure 1. The biological sensitivity of lakes is more complex than chemical sensitivity because it is influenced by numerous biological factors not measured during the surveys reported here.

The purpose of this document is to provide information on the status of lakes in British Columbia with respect to acidic inputs. Acidic inputs do not originate necessarily as acid precipitation, but also can originate as acidic waste water effluents discharged from industrial operations.

The information in this document relates solely to lakes and does not reflect river water quality. The reasons for this are:

  1. Rivers and streams can reflect recent events such as snowmelt. An accurate representation of the water quality of a river or stream is not possible unless a large number of samples are obtained in one season
  2. Lakes provide a zone in a watershed where short-term events such as snowmelt can be averaged out. This reduces the necessity to collect samples as frequently as would be the case for rivers and streams
  3. The water quality of rivers and streams can vary along their length more than lakes due to the heterogeneous geological nature of drainage basins
Acidic inputs to a lake can cause the lake to increase in acidity. The acidity of any substance can be measured on the pH scale which has values ranging from 0.0 to 14.0. The scale is divided equally between acidic and basic conditions; values less than pH 7.0 are acidic while those greater than pH 7.0 are basic. Vinegar has a pH of 2.2 while milk of magnesia has a pH of 10.5.
Return To The Table of Contents

Figure 1. Approximate Locations of Lakes Sampled for Mapping Sensitivity.
lake location map
Return To The Table of Contents

DISCUSSION

The acidity of a lake has a direct impact on the numbers and types of aquatic organisms present. This is illustrated in Figure 2, which shows that 100% of fish will be present at pH 6.0 but less than 50% of leeches. All freshwater molluscs will disappear at this same pH.

Figure 2. Percentage of Species Able to Exist at Various Lake Acidity Levels.
species and pH graphs

In British Columbia, most of the 752 lakes where pH measurements have been made since 1977 have pH values greater than 6.0. Figure 3 represents the percentage of values in each pH range. Only about 1% of the 752 lakes have had pH values less than 6.0 The locations of these lakes is shown in Figure 4. The lakes are distributed throughout British Columbia, from the Queen Charlotte Islands and Prince Rupert area to the Wells Gray Park area (Haggen #1 in Figure 4).

Figure 3. Lake Acidity Levels in British Columbia.
lake acidity chart

Figure 4. Lakes with pH less than 6.0.
map of lakes with pH under 6.0

The biological effect that any acidic input will have on a lake will depend on several factors. These factors include the number and type of aquatic organisms present, the quantity of acid which reaches the lake, the degree of neutralization of the acid which occurs prior to its reaching the lake and the chemical sensitivity of the lake to pH change. The chemical sensitivity of a lake to acidic inputs relates to the quantity of buffering material present in the lake to neutralize incoming acids. A lake of high chemical sensitivity has little capacity to provide buffering, while one of low sensitivity has sufficient buffering material present to neutralize most acidic inputs. A lake with moderate sensitivity can neutralize all but fairly large acidic inputs.

In British Columbia, lake sensitivity is determined from measurments of the alkalinity and/or calcium present. Measurements of these characteristics were made at the Environmental Laboratory of the Ministry of Environment and Parks in Vancouver. Alkalinity provides the most direct measurement of sensitivity of a lake to acidic inputs, since it measures the carbonate-bicarbonate buffering capacity. Thses anions generally are in equilibrium with calcium and magnesium cations. In British Columbia, the chemical sensitivity of lakes is determined according to the following criteria for alkalinity and calcium.

Characteristics
(mg/L)
Sensitivity
High Moderate Low
Calcium less than 4 5 to 8 over 8
Alkalinity less than 10 10 to 20 over 20
These criteria are consistent across Western Canada (Saskatchewan Research Concil, 1982).

Using these criteria a lake sensitivity map for British Columbia was prepared using data collected from 1977 to 1983. The preparation of this map initially required that two sensitivity maps based on calcium and alkalinity measurements had to be prepared. The lake sensitivity map was produced by overlaying these calcium and alkalinity maps ( Figure 5). The final map depicts the most sensitive rating from either of the initial maps, i.e. and area of high sensitivity on either map became an area of high sensitivity on the final map, an area of moderate and low sensitivity on the initial two maps became an area of moderate sensitivity on the final map.


Figure 5. Lake Sensitivity to Acid Rain.
lake sensitivity to acid rain map

Figure 8. Lake Sensitivity to Acid Rain: Based on Calcium.
lake sensitivity based on calcium map

Figure 9. Lake Sensitivity to Acid Rain: Based on Alkalinity.
lake sensitivity based on alkalinity map

Finally, we took this map, Figure 5 and combined it with a similar map based on the potential of soils and surficial geology to reduce acidity to produce a map of sensitive environments to acidic deposition, Figure 11.

Figure 11. Sensitive Environments to Acidic Deposition.
lake sensitivity to acid inputs map

Figure 6 shows the distribution of lakes according to calcium and alkalinity measurements for the period 1977 to 1986. Approximately 65% of all lakes sampled have low sensitivity, 15% moderate sensitivity and 20% have high sensitivity.

Figure 6. Distribution of Lakes in British Columbia by Each Sensitivity Rating Characteristic (1977-1986).
sensitivity rating chart

The lakes classed as having high sensitivity based only on alkalinity can be further subdivided as follows: Details related to the pH and sensitivity of each lake sampled in the period 1977 to 1986 are in Tables 1 to 5. Lakes are listed alphabetically and have been grouped according to their location by Ministry of Environment and Parks regions ( Figure 7 because of duplication of some lake names within the Province. When calcium and/or alkalinity values are not available for a lake, the sensitivity has been estimated from the lake pH. This estimate has been made according to the region that the lake is located in and by data for other lakes in the same region with similar pH and known calcium and/or alkalinity, Figure 10.

Figure 7. Regional Boundaries of the Ministry of Environment.
regional boundaries map

Figure 10. Present Lake Acidity: Based on pH.
present lake acidity based on pH map

In some other cases, calcium and alkalinity values (and hence sensitivity) have been estimated using relationships between total dissolved solids and each of calcium and alkalinity. These relationships have a confidence level of between 85 and 90% associated with them, and are based on between 670 and 740 paired measurements in lakes throughout British Columbia. These relationships are indicated in the Tables.

Other relationships which do not have the same confidence level are listed below. These are provided for the benefit of other researchers.


AlkI = -1.912 + 1.008 AlkT
where: AlkI = inflection point alkalinity in mg/L and AlkT = total alkalinity to pH 4.5 in mg/L
n = 698; r2 = 0.9996

AlkI = -12.133 + 0.770 TDS
where: AlkI = inflection point alkalinity in mg/L and TDS = total dissolved solids in mg/L
n = 662; r2 = 0.9047

SO4 = -0.001 + 0.087 TDS
where: SO4 = sulphate in mg/L and TDS = total dissolved solids in mg/L
n = 698; r2 = 0.9996

Na = -0.278 + 0.524 TDS
where: Na = sodium in mg/L and TDS = total dissolved solids in mg/L
n = 251; r2 = 0.6746

K = -0.586 + 0.021 TDS
where: K = potassium in mg/L and TDS = total dissolved solids in mg/L
n = 242; r2 = 0.6295

REFERENCES CITED

Return To The Table of Contents

Table 1. Lake Sensitivity Characteristics: Vancouver Island Region.
Lake Names pH Calcium (mg/L) Alkalinity (mg/L) Sensitivity Rating
Alice 7.2 8.5 24.6 low
Bear Creek Reservoir 6.8 1.7 7.1 high
Beaver 7.1 4.8 18.8 moderate
Beck 7.5 23.8 93.5 low
Benson 7.5 9.6 26.7 low
Blackburn 7.3 12.1 38.0 low
Blackjack 7.0 5.6 21.1 moderate
Blenkinsop 7.6 29.3 101.26 low
Blinkhorn 7.1 ..... 23.6 low
Bonanza 7.1 3.3 14.7 high
Brannen 7.3 6.0 18.6 moderate
Bullocks 7.3 11.9 34.8 low
Buttle 7.3 8.9 24.6 low
Cameron 7.6 12.2 35.8 low
+ Camp 7.1 4.7 15.3 moderate
Campbell 7.2 7.0 20.0 moderate
* Cathers 7.4 ..... ..... high
+ Cecil 6.7 20.2 83.6 low
* Chewhat 6.8 ..... ..... high
Chehalis 6.8 2.0 7.5 high
Comox 7.4 5.2 18.6 moderate
Cowichan 7.2 7.2 20.1 moderate
Crest 7.1 4.2 15.0 moderate
Cusheon 7.5 10.1 26.1 low
Daisy Reservoir 7.3 8.3 21.5 low
Doobah 6.7 1.65 5.3 high
Durrance 7.9 21.4 65.1 low
Echo 8.1 42.7 100.1 low
Elk 8.3 15.6 51.4 low
Elsie 6.9 4.0 14.1 moderate
Flume 7.1 6.9 23.4 moderate
Ford 7.6 13.1 37.7 low
Fork 6.8 4.8 14.8 moderate
Fuller 7.1 3.8 11.4 high
Fulmore 6.4 1.2 4.2 high
+ Garrett 7.2 3.7 10.6 high
Glen 7.5 13.9 ..... low
Glinz 7.2 3.4 14.0 high
Great Central 6.9 5.1 14.7 moderate
Green 7.1 10.6 26.8 low
Heal 7.6 18.1 48.1 low
Henderson 6.7 3.2 8.9 high
Hobiton 6.7 1.9 6.6 high
Holyoak 6.8 1.1 4.6 high
Horne 7.3 9.8 29.7 low
Ida 7.4 6.9 20.7 moderate
+ Illusion 7.1 5.9 20.6 moderate
Jarvis 6.6 0.9 5.26 high
John Hart Reservoir 6.8 6.4 19.2 moderate
Kennedy 6.8 3.6 10.8 high
Keta 6.5 1.6 5.6 high
Langford 8.1 18.5 55.6 low
Lapan 6.4 1.2 3.8 high
Larry 6.2 1.0 4.1 high
+ Lawson 7.1 3.6 9.9 high
Lizard 7.1 3.4 12.3 high
Long 7.3 9.3 25.3 low
Lower Campbell 6.9 6.4 17.6 moderate
Lower Drum 7.3 2.9 11.1 high
+ Lower Stella 7.3 2.7 5.3 high
Maggie 7.4 3.3 10.0 high
Magic 7.8 13.4 55.5 low
Maltby 6.9 10.4 24.6 low
Maxwell 7.6 5.2 15.9 moderate
* McKay 6.7 ..... ..... high
Mesachie 7.3 4.3 16.6 moderate
Myles 6.5 4.0 12.0 moderate
Nahmint 7.1 6.7 20.6 moderate
Nimpkish 7.0 2.8 13.1 high
Nitnat 7.8 141.0 56.7 low
+ O'Conner 6.6 4.2 13.0 moderate
Old Wolf 6.5 1.6 7.2 high
Oliphant 6.5 5.8 17.1 moderate
Philips 6.4 0.9 4.4 high
Pike 6.9 8.67 22.9 low
Poiorier 6.7 3.0 12.6 high
Powell 6.6 1.0 4.8 high
Prospect 7.4 9.0 29.5 low
Quarantine 6.9 4.1 10.9 moderate
* Quennell 8.2 ..... ..... low
+ Raven 7.2 3.6 9.9 high
* Reinhart 7.4 ..... ..... high
* Richard 6.9 ..... ..... high
Roe 7.6 15.6 54.5 low
* Round 6.83 ..... ..... high
Shaw 7.2 9.2 34.2 low
Shawnigan 7.4 5.4 17.2 moderate
Sherwood Pond 7.9 97.9 125.0 low
Silburn 6.2 3.6 10.7 high
* Snakehead 7.5 ..... ..... low
Songhees 6.1 0.6 3.1 high
Spectacle 7.0 4.0 13.0 moderate
+ Spider 7.0 5.6 19.9 moderate
Sproat 7.1 8.6 25.2 low
St. Mary 7.6 9.0 30.8 low
Stocking 6.9 3.0 10.2 high
Stowell 6.9 8.4 23.1 low
Swan 8.0 40.4 ..... low
Teanook 7.1 9.4 24.4 low
Tom Browne 6.5 1.2 4.9 high
Tsusiat 6.4 1.3 4.4 high
Tugwell 6.6 0.9 4.6 high
Upper Campbell 6.9 6.9 20.5 moderate
Upper Drum 7.2 3.8 14.2 high
Upper Quinsam 6.8 7.1 16.2 moderate
Upper Thelwood 6.8 1.0 3.9 high
Victoria 7.0 3.2 13.23 high
Volcano ..... 12.47 ..... low
Weston 6.9 11.3 29.53 low
Westwood 6.9 2.7 9.8 high
Woss 7.0 2.2 10.93 high
Wrigglesworth 7.5 11.8 35.0 low
Young 7.0 2.9 15.5 high
Notes:

* sensitivity estimated on basis of pH
+ sensitivity estimated on basis of:

alkalinity = -10.086 + 0.768 TDS (r2 = 0.9056)

and

calcium = 0.093 TDS1.12 (r2 = 0.8341)

Table 2. Lake Sensitivity Characteristics: Lower Mainland Region.
Lake Names pH Calcium (mg/L) Alkalinity (mg/L) Sensitivity Rating
Acta 7.4 13.0 16.6 moderate
Alouette 6.6 1.1 3.8 high
Alpha 7.1 6.6 17.2 moderate
Alta 6.9 11.8 15.0 moderate
Anderson 7.8 15.3 50.9 low
Blaney (UBC Research Forest) 6.7 2.0 5.2 high
Burnaby 7.0 15.0 40.0 low
Carpenter 7.7 9.3 33.9 low
Cheakamus 7.0 5.7 14.4 moderate
Chilliwack 6.8 3.1 7.7 high
Coquihalla Pond 7.1 3.1 8.4 high
Coquihalla-1 6.8 3.7 11.5 high
Cultus 8.0 26.8 63.0 low
Daisy Reservoir 7.4 4.8 13.9 moderate
Davis 8.2 44.5 163.0 low
Dodd 6.7 2.2 7.6 high
Eunice (UBC Research Forest) 6.6 1.4 3.9 high
Fire 7.5 14.9 30.3 low
Glacier 6.8 4.2 8.4 high
Green 7.4 9.0 23.0 low
Green (0300203)g 7.1 18.7 ..... low
Gwendoline (UBC Research Forest) 6.7 1.5 4.4 high
Harrison 7.5 5.7 16.0 moderate
Haslam 6.8 ..... 7.8 high
Hatzic 7.4 7.1 25.3 moderate
* Hayward 6.8 ..... ..... high
Holden 7.8 9.3 29.3 low
Horseshoe 6.8 1.7 6.9 high
Jacobs (Marion) 6.6 1.7 5.6 high
Kenyon 5.4 0.4 1.9 high
Kwotlenemo 8.5 26.2 130.0 low
Lillooet 7.3 7.7 21.9 moderateh
Loisg 6.7 1.89 6.4 high
Lookout 6.9 3.7 12.3 high
Lost 7.5 9.8 23.2 low
Lower Joffre 6.8 4.5 12.7 moderate
Marion (Jacobs) 6.6 1.7 5.6 high
Mosquito 6.9 11.9 25.5 low
Nita 7.1 6.1 14.0 moderate
Pitt 6.9 2.2 6.4 high
Placid (UBC Research Forest) 6.6 1.8 4.6 high
Powell 6.6 1.0 4.7 high
Rolley 6.6 1.9 5.3 high
Sayers 6.7 1.1 3.9 high
Squeah 7.0 3.3 11.5 high
Stave 6.6 1.2 4.5 high
Sukinaw 7.4 5.2 17.6 moderate
Twin (East) 6.4 1.9 5.3 high
Twin (West) 6.2 0.9 3.8 high
UBC Research Forest #1 5.8 0.9 2.5 high
UBC Research Forest #2 6.2 1.6 4.0 high
UBC Research Forest #3 6.1 1.2 3.3 high
* West Kakawa 7.8 11.4 38.7 low
Notes:

* sensitivity estimated on basis of pH
+ sensitivity estimated on basis of:

alkalinity = -10.086 + 0.768 TDS (r2 = 0.9056)

and

calcium = 0.093 TDS1.12 (r2 = 0.8341)

Table 3. Lake Sensitivity Characteristics: Southern Interior Region.
Lake Names pH Calcium (mg/L) Alkalinity (mg/L) Sensitivity Rating
* 130 Mile 8.5 ..... ..... low
Allison 8.3 42.0 158.9 low
Anahim 9.3 6.6 56.4 moderate
Barriere (North) 7.6 6.2 21.1 moderate
Beaver 8.7 30.3 209.7 low
Birkenhead 6.5 4.5 38.7 moderate
Blue 8.2 38.9 312.5 low
Boar 8.5 32.1 31.9 low
Boldue 7.7 26.4 78.6 low
* Bose 7.8 ..... ..... low
Boss 8.3 29.7 123.0 low
Bowers 8.6 42.2 175.0 low
Brenda 6.8 3.0 9.6 high
* Burnell 8.1 ..... ..... low
Carpenter 7.3 10.5 34.0 low
Chain ..... 18.0 66.5 low
Chantslar 8.5 25.9 132.0 low
Chapperon 9.3 15.4 95.8 low
Charlotte 6.7 3.7 15.5 high
Chaunigan 8.4 28.8 111.9 low
Chilko 6.7 8.4 20.5 low
* Chimney 8.9 15.6 473.0 low
Choelqoit 8.7 32.3 237.3 low
Clearwater 8.0 16.3 78.1 low
Coldscaur 8.2 15.9 59.6 low
Conkle 7.2 3.7 16.9 high
Crooked 7.3 4.5 11.7 moderate
Crown 8.3 38.9 143.0 low
Cup 7.3 6.5 14.3 moderate
Dease, Little 8.3 32.9 99.1 low
Demers 8.3 57.0 150.0 low
Douglas 8.0 14.6 63.6 low
Downton 7.2 6.9 26.2 moderate
Dragon 8.3 30.5 122.0 low
Dunn 7.6 7.4 26.7 moderate
Dutch 8.4 21.5 96.9 low
Eagle 8.6 27.9 184.4 low
* East Hatfield 8.5 ..... ..... low
East King 7.8 24.2 78.1 low
Echo 7.9 41.7 94.2 low
Elkin 6.9 9.3 30.7 low
Ellison 8.3 13.2 59.5 low
Evaline 8.9 17.6 611.5 low
Felker 9.0 46.0 138.0 low
Fifteen Mile 7.6 9.4 36.8 low
Finney 8.3 22.6 97.7 low
Fishemn 6.9 16.3 39.3 low
Fishem (upper) 7.6 21.5 68.8 low
Fletcher 8.6 31.5 128.9 low
Forest 8.6 28.5 496.0 low
Gardom 7.8 50.0 140.5 low
Garnet 8.3 55.4 189.0 low
Glacier 6.8 1.4 7.5 high
Gladstone 7.7 49.2 278.0 low
Goat 6.8 1.9 7.4 high
Green 8.1 36.9 135.0 low
Gun 7.9 14.5 60.4 low
* Hatfield (East) 8.5 ..... ..... low
Hawkins 8.2 23.9 101.0 low
Hendrix 7.4 7.0 22.9 moderate
Holstein 7.9 27.7 68.9 low
Horn 8.5 41.7 125.9 low
* Horse 8.3 ..... ..... low
Hydraulic 6.4 3.8 13.7 high
Idleback 6.7 1.7 10.0 high
Ivey 8.0 25.1 46.1 low
Jacko 8.2 59.3 247.0 low
Jewel 8.4 19.9 72.2 low
Joan 7.2 4.5 13.9 moderate
Kalamalka 8.4 35.0 146.0 low
Keefer 7.7 11.2 33.7 low
King (East) 7.8 24.2 78.1 low
King (West) 7.9 26.5 81.0 low
Knox 9.0 19.3 392.6 low
Konni 8.4 34.0 116.4 low
Kostal 6.9 2.3 9.7 high
Lacroix (Round) 8.5 26.0 113.0 low
Lac La Hache 8.6 25.2 128.0 low
Lac La Jeune 8.4 37.3 140.5 low
Ladyslipper 6.7 1.3 8.0 high
Laird 8.4 53.0 166.0 low
Lake of Woods 6.9 1.7 8.9 high
Lassie 7.5 12.7 23.3 low
Lastman 8.0 66.5 80.8 low
Link ..... 15.1 59.0 low
Little Horsefly 7.8 ..... 56.8 low
Little Shuswap 7.6