 |
|

Establishing
Desired Future Condition
Desired future condition (DFC) is a
commonly used term for describing a restoration goal, or end-point.
The desired future condition may be an ecosystem that functions
and looks like it did historically, before it was disturbed. In
contrast, the DFC may describe a new reality that takes into account
human presence and impacts that cannot be redressed. For example,
exotic species and roads may never be removed from some ecosystems,
but it is possible to reduce or limit their numbers or extent. Conversely,
certain large predators or rare plants and animals may never be
restored to some ecosystems, so the DFC would describe a relatively
healthy ecosystem that is missing some of its former diversity.
Constructing a desired future condition is a fundamental step in
a restoration project. Reference
ecosystems, whether contemporary or historical, can often
be of assistance in developing goals. The DFC is usually constructed
using a variety of sources, such as reference ecosystems, knowledge
of the former natural
disturbance regime and the natural
range of variability, local knowledge, historical references
and maps, scientific literature, on-site clues, and professional
opinion.
Using
Reference Ecosystems
Undisturbed
or less disturbed contemporary "reference" areas and historical
landscape descriptions can be used in the development of restoration
goals. Plant, animal, soil, and water data from these reference
ecosystems provide useful "templates" for restoration
work in similar sites (Gayton 2001). The potential and problems
of using both contemporary and historical reference area information
are discussed here in turn. The serious restoration practitioner
should always consult a number of historical and contemporary sources
before constructing a template for restoration (Gayton 2001).
Using
Contemporary Reference Conditions as Templates
Ecological
Reserves, Wildlife Management Areas, Parks, Protected Areas, Rangeland
Reference Areas, and other relatively undisturbed sites, on both
public and private land, can act as sources of restoration information
(Gayton 2001). However, European influence on our ecosystems has
been so pervasive that undisturbed areas are rarely found, particularly
in zones of level, fertile land, in riparian communities, and near
populated areas where restoration projects most often occur. Because
reference areas are frequently small parcels, surrounded on all
sides by early successional
and disturbed lands, they are usually not fully representative of
"pristine" ecosystems because of edge effects, invasion
by introduced or undesirable native species, or "overrest"
(too little natural disturbance), yet they still offer many useful
clues. For example, at a Rangeland Reference Area near the East
Kootenay community of Skookumchuck, even though the biodiversity
and vigour of many species of grasses and herbs has increased inside
the protected area, the accumulation of grass litter over the past
fifty years has allowed for the establishment of a Ponderosa pine
forest inside the exclosure. Normally the combined action of ungulate
grazing and frequent fire on this dry site would not permit the
establishment of a forest (Gayton 2001).

BC Ministry of Forests |

Don Gayton |
The Milroy Grazing Exclosure in the East Kootenays.
The photograph on the left was taken in 1951, the year the exclosure
was built. The right-hand photograph was taken in 1995. Note the changes
due to the exclusion of grazing cows and elk. This exclosure can be
used as a reference area for grassland restoration.
Using
Historical Reference Conditions as Templates
Another
common reference point for ecological restoration is the way an
ecosystem appeared to function historically (Gayton 2001). Such
historical benchmarks
are generally selected from within our modern climatic period, but
before significant European influence. In British Columbia, this
period is from about 1600 to 1880, and in some very remote areas
this period may even extend to the present. Early published accounts,
old-timers' recollections, early research projects, First Nations'
accounts, archival photographs, tree rings, pollen cores, and fire
scars are typical sources of data for this era, but many others
are available to the creative investigator (Gayton 2001). Older
air photos also add to an understanding of the site, though these
generally date back only to the 1950s.

Don Gayton
Cross section of an old fire-scarred larch
from the Canal Flats area of the East Kootenays. The tree germinated
in 1600 and contains 10 separate fire scars.

National Archives of Canada
|

Don Gayton |
Photographs of the Wildhorse River taken in 1883
(left) and 1998. Notice the changes to the hillside in the middle
of the photographs. (The black marks on the 1883 photo are from damage
to the negative.)
No single historical data source will be definitive. Historical
journals and archival photographs can depict landscapes during atypical
weather conditions or unusual disturbance events. Narrow, site-specific
information and incomplete memory can skew historical observations.
The restorationist must also guard against his or her own subjectivity
when reviewing historical sources (Gayton 2001).
|