Recreational Fishery
Stock Assessment
1999 Final Report

PHOTO 1. Portal Lake,
August 1999.
Click image to view 76K JPG |
|
|
|
 PHOTO 2. Portal
Lake Day Use Site, August 1999.
Click image to view 56K JPG |
|
|
Introduction
|
TABLE 1. Physical Attributes of Portal Lake.*
Waterbody identifier |
00788UFRA |
Water surface area |
1.6 ha. |
Area above 6 m contour |
1.6 ha. |
Shoreline perimeter |
840 m |
Maximum depth |
4.5 m |
Volume |
30,890 m3 |
Mean depth |
1.9 m |
Elevation |
1,143 m |
T.D.S. |
244 mg/L |
Morphoedaphic index |
128 |
|
|
This report presents the results of a stock assessment
of Portal Lake, completed on August 11, 1999 under
a partnership arrangement between the Ministry of Environment,
Lands and Parks and the Carrier
Sekani Tribal Council (CSTC), with funding obtained
from Fisheries
Renewal B.C. through the Upper Fraser-Nechako
Fisheries Council. Field activities were carried out
by Margo French and Lawrence Ward of the CSTC. Analysis
and reporting of the field results were conducted by the
author. Inquiries pertaining to this report should be directed
to the author at the email and address located at the bottom
of this page.
Portal Lake was initially surveyed in 1981
and was determined to be barren based on gill net and minnow
trap surveys at that time. The lake was subsequently stocked
in 1982 with rainbow trout fall fry, and has since received
intermittent fall releases.
A follow-up survey was conducted in 1985 (Philip)
to investigate the status of the stocked fishery and to
resample certain biophysical attributes initially measured
during the 1981 survey. Since this survey, a variety of
stocking alternatives (i.e. fall fry vs. yearlings, annual
vs. alternate year stock schedules) have been employed on
Portal Lake, however to date these alternatives have not
been systematically evaluated. Portal Lake was therefore
assigned a high priority for assessment in 1999.
Methods
|
 FIGURE 1. Location of Portal
Lake gill net sets, August 10 & 11, 1999.
Click image to view 26K GIF |
|
An experimental, 91.2m sinking monofilament gill net was
set in Portal Lake on August 10, 1999 according to the methods
specified in the Resource Inventory Committee document Fish
Collection Methods and Standards. The net was deployed
at 11:15 AM and retrieved the same day at 3:30 PM. Only
ten fish were captured after this period, so the net was
redeployed on August 11 at 9:30 AM at a different site (Figure
1). This second net set was retrieved on August 11 at
12:15 PM, for a total combined soak time of 7.0 hrs. Set
1 was positioned from the north shore and extended in a
ENE orientation, to a maximum depth of 4.0 m. Set 2 was
positioned off the southeast shore and extended in a N-S
orientation, east of the first set. The second set ranged
in depth from the surface to approximately 3.0 m.
All trout collected were sampled for fork length, weight,
sex, maturity, and stomach contents. The general condition
of the fish sampled was also recorded. Scale
samples were collected for age structure analysis. This
analysis was performed by Darlene
Gillespie of TimeMark Consulting Ltd. (Nanaimo, B.C.).
Water temperature, weather conditions, and a Secchi disk
reading were also reported.
Results and Discussion
|
TABLE 2. Physical attributes of rainbow
trout sampled in Portal Lake, August 11,
1999.
Attribute |
Mean |
Range |
Std. Dev. |
Length (mm) |
157 |
109-405 |
80 |
Weight (g) |
72 |
14-625 |
135 |
Condition |
1.09 |
0.71-1.36 |
0.14 |
|
|
|
CATCH SUMMARY
The net catch yielded 29 rainbow trout (RB), for
a catch per unit effort (CPUE) of 4.1 RB per net-hour. The
complete data set can be viewed in Appendix
1.Twenty-five of the 29 rainbow trout sampled were classified
as "immature" and their sex could not be determined.
Of the remaining 4 fish, 3 were male and 1 was female.
CONDITION
The length-weight relationship of the Portal Lake rainbow
trout sample is described by the equation W = 4x10-5
x L2.72(R2=0.99);
this relationship is expressed in Figure
2. The small number of adults sampled precludes an in-depth
analysis of the health of PortalLake rainbow trout, however
there were no anomolies noted in the length-weight relationship.
All fish appeared to be well fed: the stomach contents of
the larger fish sampled contained snails, clams, and Gammarus,
while the smaller yearlings (i.e. < 125 mm) sampled were
feeding exclusively on insects and zooplankton.
FIGURE 2. Length vs. weight of rainbow
trout captured in Portal Lake, August 11, 1999.
Click image to view 5K GIF
LENGTH FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION
Figure 3 compares the length
frequency distributions of rainbow trout sampled during
the 1999 and 1985 surveys. In 1999, the catch was dominated
by 100 - 150 mm yearlings which were stocked into Portal
Lake as fall fry on October 6, 1998. The remainder of the
sample is made up of the 1995 cohort, which averaged 350
mm in length. The small number of 4-year-olds is likely
explained by a combination of the short set time (7 hrs.),
and to angling and fishing mortality, which would significantly
reduce the quantity of catchable trout by 1999.
FIGURE 3. Length frequency distribution
of rainbow trout captured in Portal Lake, comparing 1999
and 1985 results.
Click image to view 7K GIF
The 1985 sample distribution represents the 1982 cohort
only, which were stocked as fall fry. No other cohorts were
released until the sample was obtained in 1985. The mean
length of these 3-year-old trout was 261 mm.
|
FIGURE 4. Age vs. length
of rainbow trout captured in Portal Lake, comparing
1985 and 1999 results.
Click image to view 3K GIF |
|
GROWTH
Figure 4 compares the length-at-age
relationship for rainbow trout in Portal Lake between 1985
and 1999. The growth rate exhibited by the 1982 cohort is
not indicative of the growth demonstrated by subsequently
released fish, as density dependent factors were likely
responsible for reduced growth of that year class due to
its high initial stocking rate. Since Portal Lake was not
likely fished by anglers in the early 1980s (since it had
only been recently stocked), exploitation of the stock would
have been minimal, thereby compounding the density dependent
effects on growth.
It is difficult to interpret current growth rates in the
context of an alternate year stock schedule, since a stocking
event was missed in 1997. However the observed growth rate
of 4-year-old trout suggests that Portal Lake rainbow are
recruiting to the fishery (assuming 25 cm minimum size for
angler satisfaction) at about age 2.
The yearlings sampled in this survey were stocked as fall
fry at a mean weight of 0.8 g (Appendix
2) in 1998. By August 1999, these yearlings averaged
23.2 g, representing a mean growth rate of 22.6 g over a
43 week period. This growth rate is slightly less than that
produced by the Fish Culture program for hatchery yearlings,
suggesting that Portal Lake rainbow exhibit adequate growth
in their first year at current stock densities.
Management Recommendations
|
PHOTO 3. Portal Lake rainbow
trout sampled from Set #2
August 11, 1999.
Click image to view 61K JPG |
|
The growth rates observed for yearlings and 4-year-olds
in the present study suggest that current stocking rates
are adequate to produce catchable trout at age 2. However,
these rates may not be indicative of the longer term performance
of the fishery since a true alternate-year stock schedule
has not been evaluated. Before any firm conclusions can
be reached regarding the status of the Portal Lake fishery,
several issues must first be addressed :
-
accurate data on current angling pressure should be
obtained;
-
stocking rates should remain consistent for at least
a four year period in order to effectively evaluate
stock rates and fishery performance; and
-
a followup assessment should be completed once consistent
stocking has occurred over a four year period
In the interim, the Ministry will continue to stock 5,000
fall fry in alternate years into Portal Lake. A recommended
window for followup sampling is August 2001, at which time
the 1998 and 2000 cohorts will be available to the sample.
Sampling during this time will provide data on the mean
growth rate of three-year-old fish at a consistent stocking
level. This data can then be used as the basis to make decisions
regarding stocking options and/or harvest rates should they
be deemed necessary.
Literature Cited
Miller, C. and B. Tupniak. 1981. Portal
Lake : Lake Survey Data. Report prepared for the Fisheries
Branch, Ministry of Environment. Prince George.
Philip, D.F. 1986. Portal Lake - Stock Assessment
August 13,14, 1985. Report prepared for the Fisheries Branch,
Ministry of Environment. Prince George.
Appendix 1.
Appendix 2.
For More Information:
Contact :Ted
Zimmerman
Sr. Fisheries Biologist, Omineca sub-Region
Prince George, B.C.
250-565-6852 |